IT Migration & Harmonisation for a Swiss Design School

Note on privacy: Client identifiers and sensitive details have been anonymised/redacted.

Summary for busy readers
A Swiss design and architecture school (administratively attached to a French group) needed a structured migration and harmonisation into the group’s environment. This was neither a crisis nor a hardware refresh. It was competence‑led: assessment, standardisation, VPN integration, centralised apps (TSE/Citrix) and secure, accountable printing — delivered with no hardware sales. The cutover was smooth; users (faculty, students, admin) experienced a consistent workspace and management gained visibility without disruption.


Client context

  • Organisation: Swiss design/architecture school joined to a French school group.
  • Starting point: Functional local IT but poorly documented.
  • Goal: Integrate cleanly into a central, secure, documented environment with minimal friction.

Objectives

  • Harmonise Swiss and French IT environments.
  • Centralise administration, user accounts and servers.
  • Standardise user practices for faculty, students and admin staff.
  • Increase management visibility on assets, usage and cost.
  • Reduce printing waste and enforce accountability.

Approach (competence and standardisation only — no hardware sales)

  1. Asset inventory & analysis
    Established a baseline (workstations, local servers, student Wi‑Fi, software, internal processes) to integrate safely into the group infrastructure.
  2. Network harmonisation via Juniper VPN
    Built a site‑to‑site tunnel to the French network for secure access to the central datacentre and standardised configurations and data flows.
    Rationale: central policy control, consistent routing, simplified support.
  3. Application centralisation via TSE/Citrix
    Before: local servers, local apps, isolated environment.
    After: central account management, data in the central datacentre, access through TSE/Citrix aligned with other schools.
    Benefits: smoother updates, simpler support, improved security posture.
  4. Secure, centralised printing (Xerox)
    Implemented follow‑me printing with PIN authentication, central queues, and auto‑deletion of unclaimed jobs → immediate (observable) waste reduction.
  5. Collaboration & knowledge transfer
    Worked with the newly hired IT technician: explained existing components (student Wi‑Fi, TSE/Citrix split, workstations, network), shared SOPs and dependencies (sites, servers, VPN, environments), and supported initial migrations.
    Outcome: the technician operates autonomously post‑project.

Outcomes

  • Unified administration across Switzerland and France.
  • Smooth go‑live with a consistent user experience for faculty, students and admin staff.
  • Reduced print waste through secure, accountable printing (follow‑me + PIN).
  • Improved visibility on assets, usage and costs for management.
  • Standardised admin environment: easier to maintain, fewer surprises.
  • No capex push: results achieved through method and standardisation, not equipment sales.

What similar organisations can reuse

  • Start with a complete, documented baseline before touching routing or identity.
  • Use a site‑to‑site VPN to centralise policies and simplify support.
  • Centralise applications/sessions (e.g., TSE/Citrix) to align updates and security.
  • Deploy follow‑me printing with authentication to reduce waste and costs.
  • Prepare SOPs and a short “map of dependencies” (sites ↔ VPN ↔ apps ↔ printing).
  • Plan knowledge transfer so local IT can run independently after cutover.

Gotchas & limits

  • Documentation lag can sabotage smooth integrations — freeze changes during discovery.
  • Printing behaviours take time to stabilise; reinforce PIN use and auto‑purge policies.
  • Bandwidth/latency considerations for centralised sessions — validate real user journeys.

Next steps

Need a clean, low‑friction migration without new hardware?

→ Book your short scoping call